Algorithmic Accountability Act Text · Table (p.17)
From algorithmic_accountability_act_text.pdf · page 17
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | |||
| (B) any known harm, shortcoming, failure | |||
| 8 | |||
| case, or material negative impact on consumers | |||
| 9 | |||
| of the previously existing process used to make | |||
| 10 | |||
| the critical decision; | |||
| 11 | |||
| (C) the intended benefits of and need for | |||
| 12 | |||
| the augmented critical decision process; and | |||
| 13 | |||
| (D) the intended purpose of the automated | |||
| 14 | |||
| decision system or augmented critical decision | |||
| 15 | |||
| process. | |||
| 16 | |||
| (2) Identify and describe any consultation with | |||
| 17 | |||
| relevant | stakeholders as required | by section | |
| 18 | |||
| 3(b)(1)(G), including by documenting— | |||
| 19 | |||
| (A) the points of contact | for the stake- | ||
| 20 | |||
| holders who were consulted; | |||
| 21 | |||
| (B) the date of any such consultation; and | |||
| 22 | |||
| (C) information about the terms and proc- | |||
| 23 | |||
| ess of the consultation, such as— |
Source Metadata